I’m also really pleased that despite my exposures being all over the place (the camera I was shooting this film is quite limited in shutter speeds and apertures, plus I guessed the light every time), the results have almost always come out. Over- and under-exposures seem to be really easy to correct and some sort of an image is almost guaranteed no matter how this film was shot.
I must add that I bumped the contrast to most of the new photos in Photoshop, but that’s mostly to suit my taste and hide some grain in the shadows. Overall, the contrast profile hasn’t changed.
Now that I’ve got some images, I moved on to the next roll. This time, I developed my very expired ORWO NP20 in Ilfosol 3 for SIX minutes at 1:9 dilution.
Oddly, the results seem nearly identical. The base fog looks to have about the same density, and there’s little change to contrast, grain, or image clarity.
I live on the edge of the Cambridgeshire Fenlands and constantly photograph the landscape. One of my favourite images that sums up this odd and complicated landscape was made with an old Polaroid 600 box camera.
Love the IR trichromes! Have you seen what Jason and a few others is doing with his Nishika N8000 camera? Thought it’s pretty cool also (but not the same quality, of course): youtube.com/watch?v=vREz-Q…
What incredible timing. I just came into two rolls of this film. I don’t know how it was stored, unfortunately. But now I’m much more emboldened to shoot it.
The exposure tests appear to show that the EI 50 I chose (the box speed of this film is 80ASA) is a decent choice for this film. It can still be shot at EI 100 or the box speed with good results and more contrast but adding light doesn’t seem to look as good (while there are more details, changing the contrast of this film in post will add grain thus unless the “washed-out” look is desired, this is probably not the way to go).
Development times still need work as the base fog is still significant and I wonder if…
But I am pleasantly surprised by this thirty-year-expired film‘s wide dynamic range. There are easily seven or eight stops of DR in this photo, which NP20 appears to render.
With the exposure and development times I used, this film appears to have a medium contrast. And this contrast level can’t be easily altered without introducing more grain.
ORWO NP 20 is an aging black and white film for novelty half-frame cameras that expired back in 1992.
(Coincidentally, this is the same year Lomography was formed; these numbers are also used in their brand-new emulsion: Lomochrome Color’92 — analog.cafe/r/lomochrome-c…).
I bought three bricks of this film earlier this year in an attempt to figure out how to use it with my Welta Penti 0 camera (analog.cafe/r/welta-penti-……
Update. It appears that CineStill never sued CatLABS, according to this PetaPixel article and their quoted statements (with receipts) in it: petapixel.com/2023/10/11/f…
The article clarified that CineStill sent a cease and desist letter that’s “neither legally binding nor a lawsuit.” A copy of this letter can be found here…
TIL: CineStill is suing film photography businesses for the misuse of their newly-minted trademark, “800T.”
While the film community is generally tight and friendly, lawsuits around business entities aren’t unheard of. Some years ago, Polaroid threatened to sue Instax for the square format (which they settled under undisclosed conditions) — and I am sure there’s more. I think it’s fair to understand that photography, aside from being an art form, is often a livelihood for many, the threat against which can…
Dmitri
Dmitri
Dmitri
Dmitri Edited
Dmitri
annteegen
Dmitri
andrewbartram66
Dmitri Edited
ratsrule67
Dmitri
Jim Grey
Dmitri
Gordon Nicol (Gordo…
Dmitri Edited
Dmitri
Dmitri
Dmitri Edited
Dmitri
Dmitri